Direct, attributable evidence such as a filing, permit, deed or utility record.
Pource Data Centre Intelligence · Texas
See what is actually true about Texas data-centre projects, not just what has been announced.
Pource turns scattered permits, filings, property records, utility material, company statements and reporting into one evidence-backed record per project, so you know what is confirmed, what is still a claim and what changed.
THE PROBLEM
Announced capacity is not the same as confirmed progress.
Press releases can describe a future campus in one number. The evidence usually tells a more complicated story: land may be controlled but not built, power may be requested but not secured, and a delivery date may still rest on a company claim. Pource keeps those distinctions visible instead of flattening them into one headline.
THE EVIDENCE STANDARD
Every important statement keeps its evidence class.
This is the core of Pource: the product does not make a company announcement look equivalent to a permit, deed or utility filing.
A statement from a developer, operator, tenant or other project participant.
Credible third-party reporting that has not yet been independently confirmed.
A concise reading of what the record supports, without turning evidence into a forecast.
A material question where evidence is incomplete, conflicting or not yet sufficient.
REAL DOSSIER PREVIEW
Follow a project from announcement to evidence of delivery.
This static preview shows how Pource structures a real tracked project: claims are separated from sourced milestones, and later evidence changes the project record rather than simply adding another headline.
01Announcement
Initial company capacity and delivery claims are recorded as claims, not facts.
02Site evidence
Land, ownership and jurisdiction records are linked to the canonical project.
03Power evidence
Requested, studied, contracted, behind-the-meter and energized MW remain distinct.
04Construction evidence
Permits, filings and other source-backed milestones move the dossier beyond the original announcement.
PROJECT DOSSIER · STATIC PREVIEWPRC-029 · Hillsboro
Current statusEvidence-backed record
Company claimsKept attributable
Land / siteSource-linked
PowerSeparated by evidence stage
Open questionsVisible, not hidden
PRC-029 is the public sample dossier. Subscribers unlock the full project universe, market tools, intelligence feed, comparison, search, map and watchlists.
WHO IT IS FOR
One project record, different decisions.
Prioritise diligence.
Screen for stronger evidence, meaningful progress and unresolved risks before spending time on a full underwriting process.
Track competitive development.
See where projects are concentrating, who is involved and whether announced plans are producing real development evidence.
Understand load development.
Separate headline MW from requested, studied, contracted, behind-the-meter and energized positions.
Test the project story.
Move from a client claim to the underlying source trail quickly, while keeping uncertainty explicit.
LIVE TEXAS COVERAGE
Context first. Then the live market.
The numbers and recent changes below come from the same live project and evidence records used by the product.
137Active projects tracked
78Construction or later
18,814Source documents indexed
2,480Evidence records captured
Recent changesOpen intelligence feed →
Verified project fact updated
PRC-058 · Coravel Dallas–Fort Worth Campus / ACS Fort Worth Campus / Hicks Field Road Campus2d agoHicks Field campus footprint: City of Fort Worth identifies the ACS Hicks Field data-center project as a 107-acre greenfield site near Hicks Field Road. This supports the campus footprint but does not establish parcel-by-parcel fee-title detail..
Verified project fact updated
PRC-026 · Rowan Digital Infrastructure, Temple (Bell County)2d agoRowan Temple campus site control: Rowan describes the Temple project as a roughly 700-acre campus for which it accelerated approvals and transferred existing power infrastructure to reduce delivery risk. TDLR separately lists Rowan Digital Infrastructure as owner for AUS02 Building 2 at 1855 Bob White Road. This is sufficient evidence of developer site control for customer-readiness, but it is not a complete deed/easement chain for every acre..
Verified project fact updated
PRC-022 · Google, Red Oak (Ellis County)2d agoGoogle Red Oak operating power position: Google reports current PUE for its Red Oak, Texas data-center campus. This is first-party evidence that the campus is operational and consuming power, but it does not establish a project-specific requested, studied, contracted, grid-secured or energized MW figure..
Verified project fact updated
PRC-021 · Google, Midlothian (Ellis County)2d agoGoogle Midlothian operating power position: Google reports current PUE for its Midlothian, Texas data-center campus. This is first-party evidence that the campus is operational and consuming power, but it does not establish a project-specific requested, studied, contracted, grid-secured or energized MW figure..
Verified project fact updated
PRC-068 · Galaxy Helios AI/HPC campus2d agoHelios campus land under direct control: Galaxy reports the Helios campus comprises 2,200+ contiguous acres under Galaxy direct control. This supports campus-scale site control but does not by itself establish a complete deed, parcel or easement chain for every acre..
WHY PAY FOR POURCE
It is not another stream of industry headlines.
Pource is designed to reduce the work between hearing about a project and being able to diligence it.
Useful for discovery, but stories rarely maintain a canonical project record or preserve each claim's evidence status over time.
Useful for market coverage, but a single project row can hide the difference between announced, requested, secured and energized capacity.
High quality, but repetitive: teams spend time finding, matching and re-checking the same sources whenever a project changes.
Canonical dossiers, source links, change history, watchlists, comparison, search and map tools keep the research reusable.
WHY TRUST THE RECORD
Traceability is the credibility layer.
Pource does not use client logos or anonymous case-study claims as a substitute for research transparency. The product is designed so a buyer can inspect the provenance of material facts, see where evidence is incomplete and distinguish Pource synthesis from sourced facts.
Read the research method →SUBSCRIPTION
$399 per month for individual professional access.
The public sample dossier demonstrates Pource's evidence standard. A subscription unlocks the full project universe and the ongoing research workflow around it: monitoring, watchlists, alerts, comparison, search and market-wide tooling.
- Continuously maintained Texas project intelligence and evidence trails
- Project history, source links and unresolved diligence questions in one reusable record
- Power classification that keeps MW evidence stages separate
- Watchlist, alerts, side-by-side comparison, search and market map
Start with one project and inspect the evidence yourself.
See how Pource turns a fragmented development story into a traceable record.